Surface RT - Useragent

Just for those that are interested, the Surface RT user agent is: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows NT 6.2; ARM; Trident/6.0; Touch)   I really do like the fact this device has full Internet Explorer.

Surface RT - First Impressions

It's been a few days since my Microsoft Surface RT arrived (late, I have to add - it turned up on Thursday - past the original agreed delivery date of the 26th, and outside of the window that Microsoft Support claimed later on - the 26th through to the 30th). 

I guess that Microsoft just can't run a pre-order like they used to!

Some obligatory box shots:  


USB Support - you can (literally) plug in virtually anything - even a USB Keyboard for typing things such as this blog post ...

Excellent screen - it's incredibly clear, brightness is perfect, and the touch interface is amazingly responsive. Windows 8 really does come into it's own.

Good battery life - I've not had any issues at all getting a full day's usage out of the Surface.

Office on the go - I love the fact that I have the full versions of office available at my finger tips. The usual superb device detection that you get in Windows 8 - the RT picked up my wireless HP printer and set it up without any fuss. Printing from a tablet is a strange experience. The fact that you can actually be productive on a tablet is priceless.

Internet Explorer. This might sound strange, but I find it a blessing to have Internet Explorer on the tablet. Most websites function fine in desktop Internet Explorer - then you go and try them on Safari on an iPad (and what an experience some of them can be). Not so on the RT. They just seem to work.


Would have been nice if the kickstand was adjustable - minor thing, but would have been handy.

Incapable / confusing to know what will run on the RT version; although I'm not struggling with this, I'm a software developer, so I really should know the bitness differences on processors. However, I truly understand how a normal consumer might get confused. Especially when everything just gets referred to as Windows.

Feels 'chunky' - especially when you first get your hands on it. The widescreen form factor feels off compared to an iPad, but you soon get used to it.

Non-standard charger. I totally understand that Microsoft wanted to have a quick charging device, but having something that can not charge off a PC or a standard micro usb charger (which can actually deliver the same 2A that the Microsoft one does ...) is annoying. Another device I have to buy a 2nd for to leave in the office.

Lack of apps. We still haven't seen any apps appear for things like Facebook, LinkedIn, Google+ etc. I guess it is just time, but without a larger app eco system, and more of the big names stepping in, things will be slow.

No manual. I was a little amazed that Microsoft was shipping a Windows 8 touch device with no manual - and no guided introduction covering all the gestures that the interface used. I would think that if I was coming to Windows 8 from no background in using it, I would be lost, confused and probably very frustrated.  


The more I'm using the RT, the more useful I find it - even though I opted to get the base 32GB model, without the Touch Cover, I'm still finding it is changing the way I'm working. No longer do I have to leave the laptop on just in case I need to answer an email - I can quickly rattle one off on the RT without much thought.  

I was originally planning on getting a Pro as well as the RT (development is nice enough to mean I can have lots of Gadgets!) but I'm not so sure. Partly because I actually think I will be able to do almost everything I want on this one, simple, device, but also as I am truly disappointed with the way that Microsoft handled the pre-orders on the RT. However - when I now compare the Surface RT to my partners iPad 2, I would opt for the Surface every time. Unless of course you want to just play games ... (but saying that, Microsoft has some pretty amazing offers appearing on the Surface for that too!)

Its Surface shipping day!

The big day has come. The Microsoft surface is now available but will the preorders arrive today as promised. Who knows. MicrosoftStore on twitter are confident that all will be well, but with so many people not having received shipping details and orders still showing as processing it really will be pot luck. Perhaps we are hard done to here in the UK - we don't even have a Microsoft store. If only Microsoft used a decent online store and was honest with information about orders!!

Microsoft Windows RT Surface delayed shipping?

In the wee hours of this morning I learnt that many shipments of the Microsoft RT Surface have been delayed – now it seems that the bulk of devices will not turn up until around the 2nd of November.

And it doesn’t seem like this has been limited to a specific geography – with people from America and Canada reporting the same notifications. Oddly, it seems to bring it all in line with the Australia shipping details.

Even more oddly, the Microsoft Store (awful design by the way) still indicates that shipping is 1 to 2 weeks – one week puts it on the 26th (launch day), and two puts it on the 2nd November. I wander which is right.

UPDATE: A further update from Microsoft Store indicates that the November 2nd updated date was sent out in error. Its not clear if this is just in error to UK purchases, or if it was the same mistake across the board ...

Getting Windows Mobile 7 Development going on Windows 8

After switching to Windows 8, I have had the fun of reinstalling all my apps. The first annoyance was discovering that the 7.1 (and 7.1.1) versions of the Windows Phone SDK does not work with Visual Studio 2012 (damn), so back to install VS 2008 aswell.

But I then hit another problem – the SDK kept failing to install. A google around lead me to this post. Downloading the app, leads you to another 30 odd Mb of downloads. Fun.

However, installing this update and then running a repair on the Windows Phone SDK 7.1 did eventually get it to install.

Then you need to install the 7.1.1 update, and you should be away.

Don’t forget to ensure you apply the VS 2008 SP 1…

N.B: If, like me, you need to do all this on more than one PC, you might find the download in the middle annoying. Once you have downloaded it, you can grab the files from (on Windows 8 anyway, adapt for your platform): c:\Users\<username>\AppData\Local\Microsoft\GFWLive\Downloads.

Using the Raspberry Pi as a log forwarder

Following on from my previous post on the Pi, I thought I’d quickly document the process to use it as a log forwarder (well, a syslog forwarder).

The Rasbian distribution already comes with rsyslogd installed, so we only need to make a few tweaks to the /etc/rsyslog.conf file.

First was to uncomment the lines at the start of the file to enable remote reception of events:

# provides UDP syslog reception
$ModLoad imudp
$UDPServerRun 514

# provides TCP syslog reception
$ModLoad imtcp
$InputTCPServerRun 514

Then to add some additional global configuration to enable the caching (in memory, and only resorting to disk when absolutely necessary) of messages:

$ActionQueueType LinkedList   # use asynchronous processing
$ActionQueueFileName srvrfwd  # set file name, also enables disk mode
$ActionResumeRetryCount -1    # infinite retries on insert failure
$ActionQueueSaveOnShutdown on # save in-memory data if rsyslog shuts down

Then to add a rule to forward the entries I’m interested in (IP’s are not real):

if $fromhost-ip == '' then @
& ~
#End forwarding

And that's it. One syslog forwarder. Next I’ll probably post about the app I’ve written to receive, index and allow easy access to the syslog data Smile

The whole reason I did this was to capture data from my router, and move it to a database on my desktop – when it’s on. I don’t want to leave my desktop on all the time, as that’s a massive waste of electricity, and the Pi solves it with a neat and tidy, low power solution.

We have Pi!

My Raspberry Pi turned up today!


First task for this little thing is to work as a buffering syslog server (using rsyslogd if you are interested).

Azure-Billed for Virtual Machine VHD Storage in same domain?

I’ve raised this issue with Microsoft Support, but feel that I need to document it just in case other people are seeing the same thing (and don’t realise that they don't have to pay!).

For the past few months I’ve been experimenting with the Azure Virtual Machine trial – and dutifully setup Locally Redundant (non-geographically dispersed storage) for the VHD’s – and created the Virtual Machines in the same region (North Europe). And all was well.

Until last week.

Since then I have been billed for the bandwidth between the VM and the VHD storage – something which, as they are in the same region, that should not be occurring.

I’m still waiting on Azure Support to resolve the problem (and refund the charges that I’m still accruing – because they tell me they can’t suspend them – sounds fishy to me), but the most amusing / annoying thing was that the support agent concerned couldn't identify that they were both in the same region. Funny, when I login to the portal it seems easy enough.


Google Nexus 7 - User Agent

I spent ages trying to find the user agent string for a Google Nexus 7 yesterday – unsuccessfully.

So I borrowed one and captured it.

Just in case anyone needs it, the Jelly Bean update user agent string for a Nexus 7 is:

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; Nexus 7 Build/JRO03D) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.166 Safari/535.19